Don’t you think part of this argument or discussion should be whether or not the vaccine is effective? What are the costs of breakthrough cases? What are the cost of adverse effects from the vaccine -whether under or over reported -VAERS is cibxrhbjjh-over 200,000 doc visits, 71,000 hospital admission
This argument would hold stronger if the vax was less leaky n less side effects
Lastly natural immunity for a disease with 99% survival vs endless boosters also have real costs not to mentions the lockdown n disastrous policies
Absolutely, I think that is a valid point. To try and steel man the other side of the argument you can ignore the side effects and you still find that the argument fails since health and natural immunity are better indicators of health risk than vax status. That said, I agree that a full accounting of the costs would have the consider the health risks associated with the (albeit rare) side effects of the vax. It's just one more reason to drop the mandates and allow this be an individual decision.
Don’t you think part of this argument or discussion should be whether or not the vaccine is effective? What are the costs of breakthrough cases? What are the cost of adverse effects from the vaccine -whether under or over reported -VAERS is cibxrhbjjh-over 200,000 doc visits, 71,000 hospital admission
This argument would hold stronger if the vax was less leaky n less side effects
Lastly natural immunity for a disease with 99% survival vs endless boosters also have real costs not to mentions the lockdown n disastrous policies
Don’t you think part of this argument or discussion should be whether or not the vaccine is effective? What are the costs of breakthrough cases? What are the cost of adverse effects from the vaccine -whether under or over reported -VAERS is cibxrhbjjh-over 200,000 doc visits, 71,000 hospital admission
This argument would hold stronger if the vax was less leaky n less side effects
Lastly natural immunity for a disease with 99% survival vs endless boosters also have real costs not to mentions the lockdown n disastrous policies
Absolutely, I think that is a valid point. To try and steel man the other side of the argument you can ignore the side effects and you still find that the argument fails since health and natural immunity are better indicators of health risk than vax status. That said, I agree that a full accounting of the costs would have the consider the health risks associated with the (albeit rare) side effects of the vax. It's just one more reason to drop the mandates and allow this be an individual decision.
Don’t you think part of this argument or discussion should be whether or not the vaccine is effective? What are the costs of breakthrough cases? What are the cost of adverse effects from the vaccine -whether under or over reported -VAERS is cibxrhbjjh-over 200,000 doc visits, 71,000 hospital admission
This argument would hold stronger if the vax was less leaky n less side effects
Lastly natural immunity for a disease with 99% survival vs endless boosters also have real costs not to mentions the lockdown n disastrous policies